“Crumbs”
Mark 7:24-37
September 9, 2012
Gathering Sunday/Christian Education Sunday
It didn’t take long for the dogs in
our family to figure out the best place to sit underneath the table at
mealtimes. What I mean by that is that
it didn’t take long for our first dog, Boris, or our dog, Belinda, to realize
that there was at least one person in the family who dropped a certain amount
of crumbs during any meal. And those
crumbs were fair game for a dog that moved quickly. My mom used to joke that when we would all
gather at their house for an extended family meal, any dog they owned would
always sit underneath the youngest grandchild’s chair. And when a grandchild wasn’t in the vicinity,
the dog would sit under Grampa’s chair.
When my kids were babies, one of
the many tricks they learned as they first ventured into the world of finger
foods was that if they just casually held out a piece of food there would be a
dog ready to eat it. So they’d feed
themselves, and then feed the dog. Feed
themselves. Feed the dog.
I’m so used to having a dog clean
up the crumbs that spill during a mealtime, that I don’t know what to do when
we eat somewhere there is no dog. Our
dogs have always cleaned up the crumbs.
This is great when it’s a literal
dog eating the literal crumbs that fall from a table. But it doesn’t sound so nice when this is
turned into a metaphor and applied to a human being. It definitely doesn’t sound nice when it
comes from Jesus. It’s as if the
Superhero suddenly turned into the evil villain; Batman into the Joker or
Spiderman into Green Goblin.
This isn’t what we expect when it
comes to Jesus at all. Jesus is supposed
to be the compassionate savior. But as
Matt Skinner, professor at Luther Seminary wrote, it seems that “Jesus gets caught
with his compassion down.” This is even
more jarring in light of what Jesus said in the passages we read last week, the
ones immediately preceding this story.
Jesus rebuked the Pharisees and the scribes on the issue of
defilement. It is what comes out of a
person, Jesus told them, what comes from their hearts that defiles.
Now we come to this story about
Jesus and the Syrophoenician woman, and if you’ve been paying attention, you
may be wondering as to the workings of Jesus’ heart when it comes to his
response to this woman’s need.
Jesus has made his way to the
region of Tyre. He had hoped to find a
quiet, secluded place to stay there where no one could find him, but as Mark
writes, “he could not escape notice.”
A woman whose daughter had an unclean
spirit heard about Jesus and came to him, bowing down at his feet. She was a Gentile, of Syrophoenician
origin. When she bowed down before
Jesus, she begged him to cast the demon out of her daughter.
Jesus’ answer to her is harsh. It’s downright rude. It is completely unlike the merciful,
compassionate responses to broken, hurting people we’ve come to expect.
“Let the children be fed first, for
it is not fair to take the children’s food and throw it to the dogs.”
Dogs? Jesus insults her and her daughter. Why should she be considered a dog? Because she’s a Gentile? Certainly in other passages of scripture we
see Jesus being tough when the situation demands it. He didn’t hesitate to call certain groups of Pharisees
and Sadducees “a brood of vipers” or physically drive out the money changers
from the temple, but it’s easy to reconcile that because they always seemed to
have it coming. But this woman? What was her fault, other than the
happenstance of her birth and ethnicity?
She came only for the healing of her child.
Yet where this response of Jesus
might have stopped me in my tracks – I would have most likely left Jesus in
tears – the woman is undeterred. And she
comes back with a sharp reply of her own.
“Sir, even the dogs under the table
eat the children’s crumbs.”
You’d think that this kind of
response might make Jesus angry, even more determined not to heal her
daughter. Instead her words to Jesus
bring about the result she had hoped and prayed for. Jesus says, “For saying that, you may go –
the demon has left your daughter.”
The woman didn’t ask anything
else. She doesn’t speak again. She hears
Jesus’ healing words, then goes home and finds her daughter lying on the bed,
demon gone.
But we are still left with the
question of “why?” Why did Jesus talk to
the woman in this way? Why did he
initially refuse to do anything for her?
One interpretation has been that
this was a test. Jesus was testing this
woman’s faith. As Skinner puts it, some
interpreters want us to hear Jesus speaking these words with a twinkle in his
eye. But that’s out of character as
well. In no other passage is a person
who comes to Jesus for healing tested like this. And if this were a test, why did the woman
have to endure being insulted as well as tested?
Another way of looking at Jesus’
response to the woman is that Jesus wanted to be a living example to his
disciples of how words can defile. I’ve
approached this passage with this kind of argument before. Perhaps Jesus thought that if he parroted
their cultural bias against Gentiles to this Gentile woman, then they would
realize how wrong that kind of prejudice really was. The problem with this line of thinking is
that as far as we can tell, Jesus was alone.
Maybe the disciples were nearby, but they’re not mentioned.
Jesus went to Tyre hoping to be unnoticed. A fellow clergy person wrote in The Christian Century about how this
illustrates that Jesus, like all of us needed downtime, but he couldn’t get it
and his response was a grumpy consequence to his mental and physical
exhaustion. He responded in a very
tired, very human way.
I think that last interpretation
has some merit. This is Mark’s Jesus
after all. And Mark’s Jesus is very
human. In his hometown he was powerless
to do anything. Here he gives a cutting
response to a woman in great need. Maybe
his words reflected his own cultural bias.
Mark’s Jesus is very human, and we reformed Christians claim that. We claim that Jesus was both human and
divine. And it’s all great until Jesus acts human. Then that puts what we say we believe right
back in our face and forces us to deal with what it means for the Son of God,
the Messiah to be human. Maybe the human
Jesus was wrong?
Now I’m not trying to let the human
Jesus off the hook here, or merely gloss over what his humanity in this passage
means, but it seems to me that the person who really needs to be lifted up in
this part of the story is the woman.
Jew or Gentile, she was a woman in
a patriarchal society. Let that sink in
for a moment. She was a woman in a
patriarchal society, yet she has both the gall and the daring to argue with a
man; not just any man, but a man who was reputed to be a great teacher, a great
healer. Some were even claiming he was
the messiah the Jews were waiting for.
But this great man told her no.
He told her wait. It wasn’t the
Gentile’s time yet. But she was not
going to be put off. She was desperate
because the life of her child was at stake.
Wait for what?
So she argued. She persisted. In just one sentence, she demanded that Jesus
be who he claimed to be. She didn’t need
a lot. She knew that just a crumb of
grace would be sufficient. She demanded
that Jesus be who he claimed to be.
Heal my daughter! Even if I am a dog waiting for a crumb at the
children’s table, you can do this. You
can heal my daughter. I will not be put off. I will not wait. Heal.
My. Daughter.
And Jesus does. She wins her argument. Jesus changes his mind. Maybe he even changes his heart. Her daughter is healed. Her faith was strong. It was strong enough that she didn’t ask for
proof of the healing or for reassurance that all would be well. She heard Jesus’ words that the demon had
left her daughter and she went home to the truth.
Jesus changed his mind. This is not unprecedented however. In Genesis, Jacob wrestles with the angel all
night, refusing to be bested and refusing to let the angel go until he received
a blessing. This is only one of several
stories where God changes God’s mind.
But the divine mind is changed
because the person demanding the change believed that God would do what God
promised. The person in the argument
with God trusted that God was faithful and that he or she was included in the
consequences of that faithfulness.
That’s what this woman did. She
persisted in her faith. She willingly
argued with Jesus. She trusted that
Jesus would do what he said he came to do.
She trusted in the abundance that had been promised. She trusted that, somehow, she was included
in the consequences of that promised abundance.
As I said before, she didn’t require a whole lot, just a crumb. But she trusted that that crumb would be
there. Yes, her persistence was driven
by her desperation. But when is it not? When I have gone toe-to-toe with God – and
yes, I have argued with God on more than occasion – it wasn’t out of some
philosophical need to have a discussion.
It’s because I was scared and desperate and anxious. I argued with God because I have faith that
God’s keeps God’s promises. I persisted
because I believed that God would make good on God’s word.
Maybe that’s the real lesson – and
the real good news – for us today. We
have to be persistent in our belief that God makes good. We have named this day Gathering Sunday, and
designated time in our service to recommit ourselves to God, to Christ and to
our discipleship. We recommit ourselves
to our persistent, persevering faith that God’s abundant kingdom is right here
in our midst and that we share in the inheritance of that kingdom. This is a powerful story to hear then on this
day when so many churches celebrate the starting of Christian Education
programs and the renewal that comes at this time of year. We persist in faith because God makes
good. And no matter how unlikely it may
seem God’s abundance will be here for all of us, in our lives, in this
congregation, in this church building, in the larger community. And we believe that in the long run, God’s
abundance will be more than just crumbs.
Let all God’s children say, “Amen!”
No comments:
Post a Comment