John 1:6-8, 19-28
December 14, 2014
The movie, Witness, tells the story of a young
Amish boy who witnesses a brutal murder, and the police detective who risks his
own life to protect the boy and his family.
Shortly after the little boy has seen the crime, he is in the police
station with the detective. In an extraordinary
scene, Samuel – the Amish boy – is waiting for John Book – the detective – to finish
a phone call. Only vaguely noticed by
the other police officers, Samuel wanders freely around the station, then stops
at a trophy case and looks at a picture displayed inside. The expression on Samuel’s face conveys his
recognition of the man in the picture, his shock, and his fear. He looks from the picture to Book, then back
to the picture again. When Book briefly looks
up from his phone call and sees Samuel’s face, he hangs up the phone. Walking over to kneel next to Samuel, Book looks
inside the trophy case as well. Without saying
a word, Samuel points at the picture. Samuel’s recognition and shock is mirrored on
Book’s face. He immediately covers
Samuel’s hand with his, pushing his finger back down.
Pointing
the finger at someone is generally a negative thing. When a crisis happens, we often hear that the
people involved are pointing the finger at others, assigning blame for whatever
went wrong. In the scene from this movie,
Samuel is a witness to a horrible crime, so when he points his finger, he is
pointing out the man who committed it. His
pointing was a testimony to the identity of the killer. But even if it is not in relation to a crime,
pointing fingers is not seen as a good or polite thing to do.
How many times was I told as
a child that it was rude to point at someone?
To be honest, more times than I can count. I was taught that pointing at anyone was
rude. You could point at an object. You could point at an animal. You could point the way. But you were never supposed to point at
another person, unless it was some sort of an emergency. Otherwise, pointing was not done.
I’ve never
questioned the impoliteness of pointing before.
Nor have I given it much thought, but in writing this sermon I wanted to
find out more about the reason behind this rule of etiquette. Why is it rude to point?
In an
article by Troy Patterson on slate.com, I
learned that there are a variety of reasons we don’t point at others. It was once believed that hexes were done through
the pointing of a finger. If you were
pointing your finger at another, whether you were hexing or not, it was thought
that you could draw negative attention to yourself. A stranger seeing you point, might cast the
evil eye on you.
As I said earlier,
pointing the finger at someone has negative connotations. It is a way of assigning blame. We hear about our political leadership being
stalled in their work because everyone is pointing the finger at everyone else. Pointing at someone singles that person
out. Patterson wrote that "pointing
is non-verbal stigmatization." In his
article he quoted from the book, Michelangelo’s
Finger, by Raymond Tallis.
“Why is it so rude
to point at someone, even if the action is not meant to be cruel or demeaning,
is not accompanied by blame, picking us out of a reluctant crowd for some
unpleasant, dangerous, or humiliating task? It is because the pointing finger
prods at a vulnerability we all share. We are skewered on the attention of
another person and any others to whom the pointing is also addressed. ...
Pointing, in virtue of co-opting other consciousnesses, intensifies the sense
we all have at times of being known and yet not-known—of being mis-known’, of helpless exposure to
uncomprehending eyes that imagine they comprehend us."
So by all
accounts it seems that pointing at another human being, unless it is a dire
circumstance, is the rude, wrong, and even dehumanizing thing to do. Yet this is precisely what John the Baptizer
does in the gospel of John. He
points. He points at Jesus.
John the
Baptizer, as found in John's gospel, is different from the versions of John
found in the three synoptic gospels. In
Matthew, Mark and Luke, John the Baptist is seen as having his own ministry, in
his own right. But in John's gospel, he
is there for one purpose and one purpose only, to point to Jesus.
When the
chief priests and Levites from Jerusalem ask John about his identity, he quotes
the prophet Isaiah and says, “I am the voice of one crying out in the
wilderness, ‘Make straight the way of the Lord.’” In other words, he is not the Messiah, but he
is the one who points to the Messiah. That
is what his witness is. That is really
what witness is all about, pointing toward another. John’s John points.
The reality
that John the Baptizer was the one who points to Jesus has not been lost on
artists over the centuries. Artists such
as Da Vinci and Titan painted John as pointing.
In some paintings, John is pointing up toward the sky. In others he is portrayed as preaching to the
crowds and pointing toward a lone figure standing in the distance. In still others, he is pictured with a lamb,
and he points his finger at this symbol of God’s Son. Whatever the scene the artist chose to paint,
John is pointing. John is the one who
points.
John’s action of pointing, of witnessing to
Jesus by pointing to him, seems in direct opposition of our mannerly
wisdom. While we are taught that it is
impolite to point, John’s vital purpose is to point to the Son. I can’t help but return to Raymond Tallis’
words that “pointing prods at a vulnerability that we all share.” When someone points to us, it is implied that
we are known in some way; that we are perceived in some way that may not be our
truth. Pointing opens up that
vulnerability in each of us. We want to
be known for our truth, not for a truth that someone else assumes. So pointing, even when it is done without
malice, exposes us in a way. So what
does this mean for John’s pointing? Is
it all different just because it is Jesus?
Or does John’s pointing reveal Jesus’ vulnerability?
Of course
it does. John points to the One who is
born into our vulnerability. Jesus is
vulnerable because we are vulnerable.
Jesus, the incarnation of the Word, the flesh and blood of God is
vulnerable. He is born for that reason;
to share in our vulnerability. John
points to One who is vulnerable for our sake.
That is what our fifty cent theological words all mean – incarnation,
redemption, salvation, justification.
John points to the One who is vulnerable for our sake.
I know that
my Advent sermons have all come to this basic conclusion, but I think it cannot
be overstated. What we prepare for in
this season, what we wait for, what we hope for, is the advent of a God who
does not remain aloof and far off, but is willing to be born and live and die in
the midst of us. Our God is One who
becomes as frail and fragile and vulnerable as we. And what is even more astounding and humbling
is that all of this done for the sake of love, of relationship, of a refusal on
God’s part to let us go. That is how
much we are loved. Jesus is born into
our vulnerability because we are so loved by God. No words that I can summon can fully describe
my sense of awe and wonder at that truth.
John points to the One who is born into our vulnerability because of
love.
John points
and we are called to point also. We are
called to set aside the dictates of etiquette and point to Jesus – through our
worship, our actions, and our words.
Look, do you see him? Jesus is
God’s Word made flesh and blood and vulnerability, and he was born to share in
everything that makes us human, so that we could finally know and believe and
live in God’s love. That’s the One who
is coming to us, that’s the One who was born into our vulnerability so that we
could know God’s love. That’s the
point. Let all of God’s children say, “Alleluia!” Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment