Mark 1:29-39
February 8, 2015
“How are you fixed for socks and
underwear?”
This is the response I would hear
from my mother whenever I would get overly demanding as a child. Interestingly enough, I seemed to hear it
more frequently when I was a teenager. Yet
whether I was being a demanding child or a demanding teen, I heard these words
in response to my verbal lists of things that I needed or wanted from my
mother. “Mama, I need that permission
slip signed.” “Mama, I need to sell 50
raffle tickets, by tomorrow.” “Mother, I
need my favorite jeans washed or I can’t show my face at school.” “Mother, I need… Well, you get the gist. My mother, who worked full-time inside and outside
of the home, would listen to my never ending list of demands; those things I needed her to do
for me now, and she would calmly
reply, “Okay. How are you fixed for
socks and underwear?” This phrase was a
vivid reminder to me that the person I was demanding so much of was my mother. She was not a housekeeper, nor a
servant. However since I was obviously treating
her like the maid, she might as well make sure I had enough socks and underwear
too. Although she rarely if ever said,
“I was not put on God’s green earth to be your servant,” that’s what her socks
and underwear retort meant. I’m your
mother, not your servant. Please treat
me accordingly. I do not live to
serve.
As I read it, “serve” is the
critical word in this first part of our gospel passage. To be honest, whenever this text has appeared
in the lectionary readings in the past, I’ve either focused solely on the last
part of the passage where Jesus goes off to a quiet place to pray, or I’ve
avoided it entirely, and preached from one of the other texts given for this Sunday. The reason I’ve done this is
because this particular healing story bothers me. It does not bother me that a healing
occurred. It does not bother me that it
was a woman who was healed, or that the only clue to her identity was being
Simon’s mother-in-law. What bothers me
is that the minute she was healed, she began to serve. My mother may not have lived to serve, but
this woman did. She literally lived to
serve.
As I said, this text has bothered me
for a long time. I realize that I read, hear,
and experience this passage through my own particular lenses: two of them being that I am a 21st century woman and a mother. I’ve long believed that figuring out the
length of a mother’s illness is like reading the rings on a tree trunk. The more rings, the older the tree. The higher the pile of dirty dishes in the
sink, the longer the mom’s been sick. When
I read about Simon’s mother-in-law, it’s hard for me not to think about those
times when I’ve been sick in bed. Yet when
I finally felt well enough to rejoin my family, I was compelled to immediately
start cleaning because the house had fallen apart while I was down for the
count. I did not want to feel better
only to have to play servant in my own home.
And while traditional gender roles
concerning what work is designated women’s and what is designated as men’s are
changing, they still exist. As one who
has chafed at some of those roles for most of her lifetime, reading a passage
about the healing of a woman that seems to imply Jesus healed her solely so that
she might serve them is a struggle for me.
That’s why I’ve avoided it, rather than dealing with this story and the
way it rankles me. However I think my
avoidance has deprived me, deprives us, of the beauty that is to be found in this text;
specifically in this profound moment of healing.
The story immediately follows Jesus’
exorcism in the synagogue. From there
Simon took Jesus and the other disciples to his mother-in-law’s house. We don’t learn her name or anything else
about her, except who she was to Simon and that she was sick in bed with a
fever. To our ears having a fear may not
sound life threatening. High fevers can
still be dangerous, but modern medicine has ways of treating them. But modern medicine was not at hand in this
situation. There is no reason for us not
to think that her illness was potentially fatal. That makes Jesus’ healing of her even more
powerful. Just as people marveled at his
authority in teaching and casting out demons, he also showed authority in healing. He brought this woman back to life. What’s more, his authority was so unlike any
other authority ever witnessed. He needed no words to perform this miraculous
healing. He simply took her by the hand
and lifted her up.
Why did Jesus do that? Was it because she was Simon’s
mother-in-law? Was it because they were
hungry and needed dinner? Or was it
because that’s what Jesus did. Jesus
healed. He healed her because that is
what he came to do – to heal the sick in body and mind, to find the lost, to
restore those on the outside to community, to give new life. We don’t question his motives for other
healings, why question him over this one. Jesus healed her because that’s what Jesus
did. He restored this woman to health,
and to her rightful place in her household and in her community. She responded by serving.
There’s that word again. Serving.
It’s that sentence, that verse that rubs me and a lot of others the
wrong way; especially because it has been so abused and misused against women
in other contexts and times. I
understand that this was a patriarchal society.
I understand that a woman’s role and duty was to tend to the
household. She was responsible for
offering hospitality to others; and as we learn time and time again, hospitality
in that culture was not taken lightly. In
serving, Simon’s mother-in-law was doing what was required and expected of
her. She was restored to health and she
responded by serving.
Yet what does the word serving mean in this context? The word in Greek is a version of diakonos; the word our word deacon comes from. Traditionally, the deacons in a church are
those who offer pastoral ministry. They
help those who are sick, lost, hurting, alone.
In other words they serve. This
is also the word that Mark used to describe the attentions the angels gave to
Jesus after his time in the wilderness.
The angels ministered to him. They
served him.
Seeing the woman’s actions in this
way is eye opening. Her response to
being healed by Jesus was just that – response.
He healed her. He manifested
God’s love for her. She responded by
serving. Yes, serving would have been
her role and duty at that time, but I can’t help but believe that in that
precise moment, she was not serving out of begrudging obligation. She served out of love. She responded to love with love. She lived to serve.
How has Jesus healed you? How has Jesus healed us? I can’t say that I have experienced a
physical healing such as this one, but I know that I have had moments when I
have felt the tangible presence of Christ right beside me. I know that I have experienced his
unconditional love and grace wash over me and his hand take mine and lift me
up. In those moments, I have wanted
nothing more than to give back, to respond in kind. I wanted nothing more than to live to serve.
Perhaps that is the real purpose of
our worship. It seems to me that the
foundation of our worship is response.
We worship as a way of giving thanks and praise to God in Christ. We worship to be empowered by the Holy
Spirit. We worship to refocus and re-prioritize our lives. And in our
worship we are reminded of how we have been healed, and how we are covered by
grace. Through worship we remember that
we are surrounded, enfolded, and embraced by God’s complete love. We remember the new life that we have right
now because of that love. So we
respond. We serve. We live to serve because God, in love, has
first served us.
Let all of God’s children say,
“Alleluia!” Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment