Matthew 5:21-37
February 16, 2015
According
to the website, Statistics Brain, as of January 1, 2014, there are 54,250,000
single people in the United States. Of
those people, 41,250,000 have tried online dating. In a study that came out last summer, a study
that was also funded by eHarmony – one of the largest of all the online dating
sites – one third of all marriages today are couples who met on-line.
People who want to give
online dating a shot have plenty of different sites to choose from. One article that I read stated that there are
as many as 2400 online dating sites. 2400. There is a dating site for every possible
interest, character trait, or quirk you can think of. There are sites with names most of us have
heard of: eHarmony, Match.com, Zoosk,
Chemistry.com and Christian Mingle.
There’s also OurTime, for singles over 50, FarmersOnly, for, you know,
farmers, OkCupid, Plenty of Fish, Black Singles, JDate – a site for Jewish singles,
Luv@FirstTweet, Manhunt, Great Expectations, FindSoulmateatMyLoveWebsite, MeetAnInmate,
Geek 2 Geek, and, my favorite, Soulgeek.
The
yentas and the matchmakers that brokered marriages in centuries past are now found
online. By the looks of it, they are
thriving. They’re thriving because people
of all ages, creeds, ethnicities, shapes, sizes, city dwellers and rural
residents want to be in a relationship.
Even people who are not looking for romantic love want to be in some
sort of relationship – friendships, partnerships, companionships. As philosophers have termed it, humans are
“social animals.” We need
connection. We need community. We need relationships. They’re not just for Valentine’s Day.
Relationships
are at the core of our passage from Matthew’s gospel this morning, a passage
that is found in the larger context of Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount. Obviously Jesus is not referring to ways in
which we can meet other people. He is
not referring to our relationship status updates on social media. Instead Jesus is speaking, preaching about
broken relationship. His words in this section of the sermon are known as the “antitheses”
in biblical scholarship. Each antithesis
begins with Jesus saying, “You have heard that it was said …”
“You
have heard that it was said to those of ancient times, ’You shall not murder;’
and ‘Whoever murders shall be liable to judgment.’ But I say to you that if you
are angry with a brother or sister, you will be liable to judgment; and if you
insult a brother or sister, you will be liable to the council; and if you say,
‘You fool,’ you will be liable to the hell of fire.”
That’s
just for anger. I don’t believe I
qualify for anger management classes, but I certainly can get angry. If I am pushed hard enough, my temper flares. I don’t like to think about how many times
over I could be liable to the fires of hell for my anger alone.
Jesus
makes the correlation between anger and murder.
It’s not just about the physical act of murder. It is about what is in the very heart of a
person. It is about the anger we carry
within us, even if we don’t act on it in a violent manner. Who among us hasn’t, in a moment of anger,
said, “I’m so mad at (fill in the blank) that I could kill (fill in the blank)?” We know that it is horrendous to act upon
that instinct. Jesus says that it is equally
horrendous to think it.
In
each of these antitheses, there is also a given way to remedy or deal with the
wrong that is done. Jesus tells the
disciples that if we are angry with someone, or if someone is angry with us, before
we can bring our gifts to the altar, we must reconcile with that person. We are to leave our gifts at the altar and go
work it out with the person with whom we are in strife. In our context that would mean putting off
partaking of the Lord’s Supper and reconciling with the person or the people we
have a broken relationship with.
Have
we done this? I know I haven’t. We celebrated the Lord’s Supper last week,
and I’m sure I came to the table with some anger at some person. I’m sure I stood at this table with
frustration, with unreconciled relationships.
What about you?
Jesus
doesn’t stop with anger. He goes on to
talk about lust and adultery, divorce and swearing falsely.
In
the context of that culture and in the context of the Law itself, adultery was
defined as something done only by the woman.
A married woman who had a relationship with another man was the
adulterer. This was not true for a
married man. A man could have several
wives and concubines. We have examples
of this throughout scripture; starting with Abraham, the patriarch of our
faith. It was a patriarchal society, so
the burden of adultery was on the woman’s shoulders, not the man’s. That’s the way it was. But as one commentator put it, Jesus
reorients, reaffirms and radicalizes the Law of Moses It is not just about the physical action of
adultery, nor is the onus of adultery only on the woman. If a man looks at a woman with lust, if he,
in our more contemporary terms, objectifies her, then he is guilty of
adultery. It is about what is in the
heart and what is in the intent, as much as it is about the physical action.
Jesus
says it is better to tear out your right eye, cut off your right hand, purposely
lose bits and pieces of yourself than have your whole body thrown into
hell. Yes, Jesus was speaking in
hyperbole – exaggerated, extreme speech – in order to get his point
across. But his hyperbolic language does
not detract from the radical demands Jesus makes of anyone who follows him.
Now
we come to what is, for so many of us, the hardest part of this passage to hear
– Jesus’ words about divorce. At that
time, divorce could only be initiated by the husband, and all he had to do to
divorce his wife was write it down and hand it to her. I’ve heard from some sources that the husband
merely had to speak it three times: I
divorce you. I divorce you. I divorce you. It was done.
Cause or reason for the divorce does not seem to have been a
factor. If a wife burned bread, the
husband had just cause to divorce her. That
is certainly different from the causes of divorce in our context.
But
in any context these are difficult words to hear. For as much as people desperately want to be
in relationships, those relationships often end. Half of all marriages end in divorce, and it
is no secret that I understand at a new level the pain of that statistic. All of us have been directly or indirectly
affected by divorce. Even if we
ourselves are not divorced, we know people who are. We have family members who are divorced;
friends, colleagues. How do we hear Jesus’
words? How do we reconcile ourselves to
them?
In
the last of the antithesis that we read today, Jesus speaks about
swearing. This is not about using bad
language. It’s not about cussin’, as we
called it when I was a kid. It is about
oaths, swearing on or by something. Growing
up, a common phrase I heard was, “I swear on a stack of Bibles.” In that sense it was to add emphasis to
whatever was being promised. Yet Jesus
warns against that. Do not swear on
heaven. Do not swear on earth. Heaven and earth belong to God. Do not swear on Jerusalem, that is the city
of the great King. Do not swear on
something else as a way of guaranteeing you keep your promises and your
oaths. If you make a promise, keep it. Do not swear to keep it. Keep it.
Let your word be “yes, yes” or “no, no.”
Do not swear by something to do something, then break the promise you’ve
made. It is just one more way of
breaking relationship.
As
I said earlier, Jesus is speaking about broken relationships. We harm one another, we break our relationships. We break them not just in our actions, but in
our thoughts. We also must keep in mind,
again, that these antitheses were not spoken by Jesus in some random
conversation with his disciples. They
were spoken in the Sermon on the Mount; the sermon that began with the
Beatitudes. Blessed are …the
peacemakers, the poor in spirit, the meek, the persecuted, the reviled. In this sermon, Jesus tells those who will
follow him that they are salt and light.
We are called to be salt and light to a broken world. Relationships are broken. People are broken. But we are called to live righteous
lives. This doesn’t mean that we are
perfect. It does not give us justification to be self-righteous or smug or
self-serving. We, the broken, are called
to serve, to minister to, and to love the broken. But wounded as we are, in following Jesus, we
have been given a glimpse of the kingdom in our midst. Even in this broken, hurting world, we can
see a bit of the kingdom reflected even in the places and in the people that
seem most shattered. Our calling is not
about avoiding broken relationship. We
all have them, in one way or another.
No, our calling is to work for their healing.
To
quote the late Paul Harvey, we who know the rest of the story know that Jesus
came to heal what is broken. His birth,
his life, his death, his resurrection was about restoring relationship. His coming restored our relationship with God. His ministry sought to restore our relationships
with one another. Jesus came for the
hurting and the sick. Jesus came for the
forgotten and the oppressed. Jesus came
to bind up the broken-hearted. Jesus
came to tell the least of these that they were valued by God. Jesus came to show us in his very being what it
means, what it truly means, to be in relationship. The very trinity we proclaim – God, three in
one – is a model of relationship. This
passage, as harsh and as painful as it is, is about relationship. That is Good News. It is good news because it reminds us that
God values us. God values our
relationships. Broken as they are,
broken as we are, we are valued by God.
We are loved by God. That’s why
we are called to restore, to reconcile, to heal what is broken; in ourselves
and in the world. God loves us, broken
as we are. That is Good News, indeed. Let all God’s children say, “Alleluia.” Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment