Luke 10:38-42
July 21, 2013
Chef
Ina Garten, also known as the Barefoot Contessa on the Food Network, once told
a story about the first dinner party she ever hosted. She was still a relatively young bride, definitely
a novice cook, and she thought that it would be a good idea to make all of her
guests individual omelets.
As
she described it, that good idea turned out to be a terrible one. Omelets aren’t a hard dish to prepare, but
they take a few minutes, even for the most experienced of cooks. Ina realized too late that making one for
everyone at the party meant that she was trapped in the kitchen for most of the
evening. She said that was the worst of
it. She never got to spend any time with
her guests. She stood in front of the
stove all night, while her husband visited with their friends. It was at that moment that she made a
vow. From that point on whenever she
entertained, she would make sure she could prepare things ahead. She would never again ignore her guests while
she slaved in the kitchen. Ina said she
would make sure that she could prepare the majority of her meal in advance, and
then she’d have maximum time with her friends.
And if you’ve ever watched her show, The Barefoot Contessa, on the Food
Network, you know that’s what she does.
She always talks about what can be made ahead of time before having
guests over.
I
don’t know that Ina would have described herself as a Martha at that first
dinner party. But I probably would
have. I often describe myself as a
Martha. Maybe some of you do too. Of course the Martha I’m referring to is the
Martha of our story from Luke. Martha
and Mary were sisters, who when Jesus visited their home, made two very
different choices. Mary, the sister who
chose to sit at the foot of Jesus, made the right choice. Martha, who chose to clean and cook and make
all the preparations for the honored guest, made the wrong choice.
This
is the basic interpretation that I’ve heard of this story since I first
remember listening to sermons. Mary is
right. Martha is wrong. But I’ve said this before, and I’ll say it
again. I think Martha gets the short end
of the stick. I even resent the way I’ve
heard this passage read most of the time.
The way most preachers intone his words, Jesus comes across as
patronizing and snide. Martha is
perceived as nothing more than a wayward child who must be taught how to behave
correctly. But the truth about Martha is
that she was doing exactly what was required of her by Jewish law and custom. First, she was following the rules of
hospitality. Jesus was a guest in her
home. There were things that must be
done for him. Secondly, she was doing
what women were supposed to do in that culture.
The
woman bore the responsibility for the cleaning and preparing of the meal. She was doing her duty. Mary was the one breaking the rules. Mary was shirking her duty. She was also breaking a societal taboo. Women were not supposed to sit at the feet of
a teacher. They were not supposed to be
among the learners. They were to be
among the doers. According to the rules
set in place at that time, Martha was justified in her complaints about Mary’s
lack of help.
But
instead of taking her side Jesus tells Martha that she is too busy doing,
therefore Mary has chosen the better way and that won’t be taken from her. It all sounds logical and good, but if you’ve
ever felt like Martha then these words can sting.
I
had a very good friend in seminary who once said, “If you tell all the Martha’s
in the church to sit down, you might as well go home, because the church is
going to just stop.” Let’s face it, the
church runs thanks to the Martha’s. Debbie
Hamrick, the conference administrator of the CREDO conference I attended in
May, gave one of the best sermons on this passage I’ve ever heard. At one point in her sermon she said, “All of
you pastors, when you stand at the communion table, do you ever think about who
set that table?” A Martha set it. Martha’s come in every shape, size, and
gender. Martha’s, the doers, are
necessary and needed.
What’s
really interesting about this story of Martha and Mary is that it follows
immediately after the story of the Good Samaritan. Every scholar I’ve read on this passage
states that the two stories are meant to be read together. They work in tandem.
In
the story of the Good Samaritan Jesus tells the lawyer who is questioning him
that to love God is to love the neighbor.
Neighborly love is enacted love.
It is love in action. The
Samaritan showed love by doing, while the priest and the Levite worried more
about doing their duty to the law and ignored their fellow human being.
But
in this story, Jesus tells Martha that she is doing too much. She is distracted by many things. She has forgotten that only one thing is
needed, only one thing is necessary. But
Mary, the one who stops doing and sits and listens, is the one who does what is
best. So in one story Jesus affirms that
being a disciple means doing and in the very next story, he says that being a
disciple means being. Is he
contradicting himself?
No. Luke’s purpose in these two stories being
read together is to show that according to Jesus discipleship means both
things. Discipleship is both doing and
being. There must be a balance between
the two. When Martha complains to Jesus
about Mary’s lack of help, Jesus says to her, “Martha, Martha you are worried
and distracted by many things; there is need of only one thing.” You are worried and distracted by many things,
but only one thing is really necessary.
Martha was right to do, but in this circumstance her doing had gotten
out of hand. Doing her duty had become
the distraction and it was keeping her from what was really important. And that was being with Jesus. She lost her sense of balance when it came to
doing, just as the priest and the Levite had when it came to being. Their duties distracted them from what was
truly necessary – helping another child of God and taking time to listen to
Jesus.
Luke and the Revised Common
Lectionary place these two stories together deliberately, so that we the
readers are reminded about what is necessary.
We must do and we must also be.
It’s
not enough to think of ourselves as only Martha or only Mary. We must be both. Our faith is not a passive thing. Faith is active. It means doing. We are called to live out our faith, to
proclaim our faith, not just through words but through deeds. But faith is also being. Faith is finding time to listen, to reflect, be. Loving the Lord God with all our hearts, strength
soul and mind means being able to discern when to do and also when to be. It is knowing what is the necessary
thing. That’s the challenge.
It
is a challenge because as a society we tend to idolize busyness. A theologian I read once stated that the true
American idol is not just a show on television – it is busyness. We are all constantly, unrelentingly
busy. And I say this knowing that I am
completely guilty. I feel guilty when
I’m not doing something. In my mind
being still equates to being useless.
But how much of our busyness is actually necessary and how much of our
busyness is just … busyness?
A
member of the church I served in Minnesota shared a book from her husband’s
family that tells the story of their larger family history. This family was a founding member of the
Richland Prairie church, a small church in the Minnesota countryside that was
also known as the Scotland church because of the number of Scots who founded
it. In this book was a wonderful letter
written by Sheldon Jackson, the Presbyterian minister and evangelist who was
instrumental in planting the seeds for that church as well as countless others
across the United States, including Alaska.
He
wrote to his parents in 1860 about the people of the Richland Prairie church
and what he found when he arrived to spend some time with them.
“Found
them expecting me, house cleaned up, folks cleaned up. Soon after the neighbors began to gather in,
to see a ‘live Presbyterian minister,’ and there was a large company to
tea. In the evening about thirty attended
the preaching service. After the service
they were loathe to separate, some staying till midnight. These people seemed so rejoiced that they
hardly know how to contain themselves.”
Now
what did he find? A clean house, clean
folks, food prepared to serve whoever came.
That was the work of Martha’s.
But those Martha’s were also Mary’s, because they realized that what was
necessary was to put aside the doing and listen to a real live Presbyterian
minister when he was finally in their midst.
I won’t make the claim that Sheldon Jackson was a Jesus figure, but
certainly he brought the word of the Lord to these folks in a way that they
hadn’t heard in a very long time. And
the church grew from there.
It
grew from there, just as every church grows because of the Martha’s and the
Mary’s. Jesus tells us that being a
disciple means loving God and loving our neighbor, and that means loving by
doing – living out love through acts of kindness, compassion and
sacrifice. Jesus also tells us that
being a disciple means sitting at his feet, listening being with him, being
quiet, just being. Disciples must be
both doers and be-ers. Being a disciple
means recognizing what is necessary.
Sometimes what is necessary is to do, to act, just as the Samaritan
acted on behalf of the beaten and robbed man.
And sometimes what is necessary is to set aside the doing and seize the
moment to be with Jesus, just as Mary did when she left her duties in the
kitchen and sat at the feet of her teacher.
Disciples must be both doers and be-ers.
In the church and in life, both are what is necessary. Let all God’s children say, “Amen.”
No comments:
Post a Comment