Mark 10:2-16
October 7, 2012/World Communion Sunday
The movie Eat, Pray, Love tells the story of author
Elizabeth Gilbert, who wrote the book by the same name about her year long
journey to challenge, change and expand her life. Her particular quest for new understanding
and recapturing her passion for living began when Liz realized that her
marriage was coming to an end. She
divorced her husband, attempted a relationship with another man which also failed,
and then made the decision to rediscover herself by spending a year living in
three different places: Italy, India and Indonesia, specifically Bali.
In
the movie when she first gets to Rome, she is looking at an apartment to live
in during her stay. The landlady is
showing her around, sees that her ring finger is empty and asks Liz about her
marital status. Liz, in faltering
Italian, tells the landlady that she is divorced. The lady asks back in Italian, “why
divorced?” Liz, struggling to piece
together the words in Italian, gives up and answers in English. “We broke it.”
We
broke it.
There
is no passage that I want less to preach on than this one from Mark. In years past when it’s come up in the
lectionary, I’ve taken a variety of approaches to it, including not preaching
on it at all. But it’s hard to hear a
passage of this intensity read in worship, and then not hear something said
about it. The topic is too personal, too
prevalent and all of us, in one way or another, has been touched by it. Divorce.
We broke it.
Jesus’
words are in response to a question asked of him by the Pharisees. This is an old trick of the Pharisees. They ask him a question they already know the
answer to – or think they know the answer to – as a way to trap Jesus. Jesus always sees through their trickery
though, and usually throws the question back at them. This time is no different. The Pharisees ask if it’s lawful for a man to
divorce his wife. This wasn’t some
hypothetical question. Divorce
happened. There wouldn’t be rules
regarding it if it didn’t happen. In
fact it was relatively easy for a man to divorce his wife according to Jewish
law. As I understand it a husband basically
just had to say, “I divorce you.” Prenuptial
agreements weren’t unheard of then either.
Marriage essentially was a contract between two people or between two
families. There were clauses provided
for separation of property, etc. in the initial contract. Divorce wasn’t unheard of. And the Pharisees knew it when they asked
this question of Jesus. Jesus immediately
asks them a question. “What did Moses
command you?”
Well
Moses allowed for a man to write down a certificate of dismissal, essentially a
document that says, “I divorce you.” But
Jesus tells them that the reason Moses did this was because the people had
hardness of heart. They were stubborn
and persisted in knowing the ways that a relationship could be broken. But that wasn’t what God intended. What God intended was that people should be
in relationship. Marriage was one way
that two people could be in a relationship, to support one another in
relationship. That divorce was allowed
was Moses’ way of acknowledging that we mulish, hard headed and hard hearted
human beings struggle with being in relationship. And too often we are about broken relationships.
Jesus’s
tough words about divorce also point to how seriously he took marriage. As I said earlier, a marriage at that time
was a contract. Marriages weren’t often
made for love; they were made for alliance, stability, security. A woman needed marriage for protection. The family name needed to continue, so
children had to be born in legitimate relationships. I don’t know if the idea of true love was a
factor in marriages at that time. But I
think Jesus understood that marriage was more than just contractual. It was a promise. He challenges the Pharisees to think beyond
Moses to Genesis, and the intention of the marriage relationship stated
there.
God
intended us to be in relationship. I
agree. But I also know that for most of
us divorces don’t just happen randomly or without thought. Divorce may be a broken relationship but that
broken relationship can be necessary.
Sometimes two people just shouldn’t be married, and the only way forward
is divorce.
In
writing on this passage for Working Preacher.org, Karoline Lewis, a professor
of New Testament at Luther Seminary in St. Paul, Minnesota, wrote about her own
parent’s divorce when she was a senior in college. They were married for 27 years, but that
length of time didn’t mean that their divorce wasn’t necessary. She writes that they are better people,
better parents, better grandparents, because they made the tough but courageous
decision to end their marriage. They
broke it.
Our
cultural expectations about marriage have also changed. Not everyone walks through life hoping to be
married. I know far too many people who
should have stayed single, and ended up in unhappy marriages because they felt enormous
pressure to be married. Marriage has
been set as an ideal in our culture, but not everybody finds their happiness,
their fulfillment or their purpose in marriage.
We’re
also fighting a culture war about the definition of marriage. Who should be married? What is marriage supposed to look like? Who has the right, legally and morally, to
decide that? I’m not prepared to head
that debate, but these are questions we have to find a way to talk about
faithfully and compassionately.
It
seems to me that when we struggle with a passage like this, a passage where
Jesus speaks hard, even harsh words, we also have to hold these words in
tension with who Jesus was overall.
Jesus wasn’t afraid to be tough when that was necessary. He didn’t soften his words to appease his
challengers and critics. But he also
didn’t tell broken people, “Too bad for you!
You broke it!” Jesus came for the
broken people. He came for those who
were sick and hurting. He came for those
who were grieving, who were angry, who were outcast and marginalized. That was his primary concern. The reason these words on divorce are
followed by the story of him taking children on his lap, in spite of the
disciple’s objections, was because of his concern for those marginalized in
society. Children were a prime example
of marginalization. They had no power, no
voice and no real place. They were
completely dependent on others for everything.
Jesus came for them. He came for
the powerless and the voiceless, the weak and the dependent. He came for the broken.
We’re
all broken. And we all have some hand in
our brokenness. But I just cannot
believe that Jesus would tell a broken person, divorced or otherwise, you have
no place with me. I think the opposite
is true. You’re broken? Be with me.
Follow me. Find wholeness in
me. Be in relationship with me so you
can be in relationship with others.
Jesus
came to show the world a new way to be in relationship with God and with each
other. No matter how broken we are, we
still need relationship. We still need
community. Nothing makes me sadder than
hearing someone say that they stopped coming to church after their
divorce. They were too embarrassed. Too ashamed.
As if church is for the perfect people?!
No, this is where the broken people come. Or at least it should be.
There’s
a quote I found online from the author John Green that says, “The world may be
broken, but hope is not crazy.”
This
morning we will come forward to this table and take bread and drink from the
cup as a community, in relationship not just with each other but with people
around the world. And even though we
aren’t saying Green’s words aloud, that is what we are proclaiming, “The world
may be broken, but hope is not crazy.”
Because at this table, in this bread and this wine, in the people around
us, in the Spirit moving in our midst, in the love of God and in relationship
with the Son, we find hope. We know
love. We are broken, but in relationship
with God we are made whole. Let all
God’s children say, “Amen!”
No comments:
Post a Comment