II Samuel 11:26-12:13a (Ephesians 4:1-16)
August 5, 2012
If
there is one person in my family who isn’t afraid of speaking a difficult truth
to me, it’s my dad. He’s done it many
times; sat me down, told me that he thinks I’m about to make a mistake or that
I’m about to make a choice that’s unwise.
One
time I remember in particular is when I was preparing to graduate
from college. Along with resume writing
and job searches, I was also dating a young man who was – how can I put this
nicely? – a jerk. But I couldn’t see
it. And friends and family were
concerned about me getting serious about him.
In fact we were getting fairly serious.
So my dad finally sat me down and had a talk.
My
dad is a pretty quiet man. He listens intensely
to what is being said around him and does a lot of thinking about it before he
speaks. He’s not afraid to make tough
decisions or speak his opinion. But you
know that when his opinion is offered, it’s going to be one that’s based on
careful thought. He doesn’t often speak
rashly or impulsively.
So
when he decided to talk to me about my relationship, even though I didn’t want
to hear it, I listened. I hated the hard
truths my dad was speaking, especially because they concerned me, but I knew that
he was speaking from a thoughtful place – and, even more importantly, a loving
place. He spoke some hard truths, but
they were truths I needed to hear. I
listened. And thankfully I slowed the
relationship down and eventually broke it off entirely.
This
week, as we continue the story of David’s abuse of power with Bathsheba and his
manipulation of Uriah which led to the young soldier’s death, we hear hard
truths. Nathan has come to confront
David about what’s happened but he does it in a way that will ensure David
fully understands the consequences of his actions. He tells David a story.
“There
were two men; one rich and one poor. The
rich man had many flocks and herds, but the poor man had only one little
lamb. The poor man raised the lamb like a
child. It grew up with the man’s own
children. It shared from his table. It was a member of the family. It was like a daughter to the man.”
“But
one day the rich man had a visitor, a traveler who came to stay with him. The rich man wanted to serve his guest a
fancy meal, but he hated to take an animal from his own flock. Instead, he took the poor man’s lamb and
served it as the main course.”
David
became incensed at this terrible tale.
He was livid. He said to Nathan,
“This man deserves to die! He should
have to replace the man’s lamb four times over because of what he did, and
because he had no pity.”
Then
in one powerful instant, Nathan turns the story on David, and cries out, “You
are the man!”
If
I could turn this into a movie, I would have the actor playing Nathan standing
with his back to David as David spouts off about the punishment this man
deserves. Then Nathan would whirl around
to face David, pointing his finger at David’s nose and shout, “You are the
man!”
You
are the man!
These
words must have felt like a razor-sharp punch right in David’s stomach,
knocking the wind of righteous indignation out of him.
You
are the man!
This
isn’t some sad little story about some unknown guy out there somewhere. This is about you, David; you, and what
you’ve done to Uriah, to Bathsheba.
Nathan
then proceeds to tell David what the Lord has to say about the whole ordeal
that David’s lust and abuse started.
“David! I anointed you king over Israel. I rescued you from the hands of Saul. I gave you this house, your wives. I gave you the house of Israel and
Judah. And if all this would have been
too little, I would have given you even more.
But what you have done is evil in my sight. You have despised my word. You have killed Uriah the Hittite, and you’ve
taken his wife to be your own.”
“Because
of all this, there’s going to be trouble for you; trouble in your
household. You took Uriah by the
sword. Well that sword will never leave
your house from this moment on. In other
words, David, you will reap what you have sown.”
David
immediately recognized his deeds for what they were – sin – and he
repented. But the Lord’s words proved
true. In very short order, trouble
raised its head in David’s household through his older sons – Amnon and Absalom.
What
really stands out to me about this story is not so much the content of the
truths spoken to David, although certainly it was truth and it offers
significant and important insight into the dynamics of David’s family and his
kingship. But more than that, what strikes
me is the power that speaking this hard truth has to effect change. David hears the word of truth, righteous
truth, God’s truth, spoken to him through Nathan and he sees how far he has
turned from God and repents.
Speaking
a word of truth to someone is never easy.
It’s difficult at best. It can be
grueling, painful, and leave both speaker and listener feeling vulnerable. It had to have been hard for Nathan, and yes,
even God, to speak this word of truth to David.
David was a beloved son, but he had to be told the truth about his
actions and see that their consequences would be severe and far reaching.
David
had to be told a necessary, but hard truth.
But that truth was not spoken to utterly destroy him. It wasn’t done just to lay him flat, to hurt
him without any redemption. I believe
that this powerful word of truth was spoken so that David could see clearly what
he had done, so that he could see the pain he caused and hopefully become a
better king, father, husband and person because of it. It seems to me that the truth was spoken to
David because it had to be, but it also gave him the opportunity to learn and
change.
The
Lord through Nathan spoke a word of truth to David in love. It may not have sounded very loving, but it
was. That’s what Paul writes about in
these verses in his letter to the Ephesians.
“Speak the truth in love.” These
words come at the end of Paul’s passage about maintaining the unity of the
church, the body of Christ. We are all
members of one body. We all have our own
unique and useful gifts and talents that help the body to function. We have all been called, in one way or
another, to serve God and to build up the body of Christ. And we can’t be like little kids
anymore. We can’t be naïve. We can’t be blown off course by trickery or
fancy words that deceive. “But speaking
the truth in love, we must grow up in every way into him who is the head, into
Christ.”
As
I understand it, what Paul is really trying to teach the Ephesians is how to be
in right relationship with one another.
Unity is found when people live in this right relationship. Unity requires that people recognize and
affirm the calling of each member, and it requires that people use their own
gifts and talents for the good of all, for the good of that common
relationship. Perhaps even more than
that, unity requires that when we are blown off course, when we are falling
away from that relationship, the truth must be spoken to us in love.
I
guess the problem with this is that too often we speak the truth to one
another, but it’s not spoken in love.
When my father spoke a hard truth to me, it was spoken in love, but
there have been lots of other people who have spoken hard truths over the years
as a way to lay me low. I’ve had the
truth spoken to tear me down, not build me up.
I know that I’m guilty of this as well.
I’ve spoken a truth to someone to hurt rather than to help.
The
problem though is that when we tear down one another, we also tear down the
body of Christ. Speaking the truth in
love is meant to be just that. It’s
meant to build up, not tear down, to grow, not destroy. Yet we’re not always good at putting this
speaking truth in love concept into practice.
In
one of the presbyteries that I served, there was a larger contingent of
ministers and elders of one political and social persuasion than another. Whenever there was a debate on a particularly
controversial subject, commissioners on both sides of the line would queue up
to take their turn at the mic and speak their particular truth. Often, though, there would be far more from
the majority opinion waiting to speak.
What disturbed me about this was not that the people on the majority
side wanted to have their turn, it’s that they used their chance at the mic to
just verbally beat the other side to death.
We’re going to use our truths, not as a way to build up, but to tear
down, stomp on and utterly crush the other side. It was discouraging, to say the least.
But
the presbytery I went to next had a different policy. After witnessing how divisive and destructive
these debates could be to the whole presbytery body, the Executive Presbyter
determined that whenever a particularly controversial subject was to be debated
on the floor of presbytery, always, ALWAYS, the agenda would be structured so
that worship immediately followed the debate and communion was always
celebrated during that worship.
This
EP understood that no matter how angry or frustrated the commissioners might be
over a hot topic, if we could worship with one another, if we could see each
other through the lens of the Communion Table, we could find a way to overcome
what divides us. When we broke bread and
shared the cup, we were better equipped to build up rather than tear down.
The
hard truths were still spoken in that presbytery, but they were spoken in
love. That made all the difference. At some point or another, we will either have
to speak a hard truth or hear one. But
may we remember that whether we are hearing or speaking, that truth should be
spoken in love. It should be spoken to
build up, to create, to liberate and to witness to the love of God for each of
us. Let us speak the truth in love to one another and to our
hurting and broken world, so that God’s love can be felt in all places by all
people. Let all God’s children say,
“Amen.”
No comments:
Post a Comment